|
|
titanium frames
Last Post 09/13/2013 08:50 AM by Le Professeur. 25 Replies.
|
Sort:
|
|
 Prev Next |
You are not authorized to post a reply. |
|
thinline
Posts:325
 |
| 09/04/2013 10:57 AM |
|
Anyone out there ride titanium? I am doing a week or so demo with a Seven. Nice riding but a tad heavier than my current bike. Just curious what folks who regularly ride Ti think of it. Oh, also, if I get a Seven, do I have to put a "minus" sign in front of the decal now? |
|
|
|
|
79pmooney
Posts:3189
|
| 09/04/2013 11:26 AM |
|
I've got two, both TiCycles, one geared, one fixed. About 7k on each. Love them. I have never owned a "light" bike as I will never own a CF bike. My two TiCycles are not light as ti goes but weight was never part of my thinking when ordering the bikes, Both have steel forks. The geared bike is a triple. Traditional bars on both.
I love the rides. I've ridden Cycle Oregon on both, done 98 miles or more on both. Great bikes to ride over chip seal. (Actually, I don't really think that. It is just that when we hit smooth roads, I"m thinking "back to sticky tire pavement" and around me I hear a universal sigh of "Ahhhh!")
Edit: Both bikes are stiff, the stiffest two bikes I've ever owned. (All previous were steel.) I think going light on ti is generally a mistake, like going light on steel generally is. On fast bumpy downhills, I like my bikes a lot. no surprises at any speed as long as I don't tense up.
Ben |
|
|
|
|
ChinookPass
Posts:809
|
| 09/04/2013 12:14 PM |
|
| What is the build on that Seven (components, wheels)? What is the weight compared to your current bike? |
|
|
|
|
jrt1045
Posts:363
|
| 09/04/2013 12:17 PM |
|
I have a Tennessee-built Merlin Works with the traditional top tube. Great on rough roads and chip seal - could be a little stiffer for the short, steep stuff. Handles great
as far as weight/stiffness/handling - more of a function of tubing and geo selection. If you go custom, stay away from the backwards faster look (aka: The Serotta). It can be plenty stiff but will never be as light as a carbon bike, but close. That being said, you can ride it for 5 years then replace the fork/parts kit and have like a new bike. Try that with a carbon!
Best part about mine is there is nothing to scratch and the thing won't dent or break if you breathe on the top tube. I have always liked the brushed finish for ti and never bother with paint |
|
|
|
|
Yo Mike
Posts:338
|
| 09/04/2013 12:26 PM |
|
/Best part about mine is there is nothing to scratch and the thing won't dent or break if you breathe on the top tube. I have always liked the brushed finish for ti and never bother with paint/
Amen to that! Painting Ti just seems wrong to me.
My Ti ride is a 'standard' Habanero. Angles are similar to my 2 Lemonds, but TT and chainstays are a few cm shorter overall. Nice, solid, slightly stiffer ride. Don't forget the effect wheels will play in overall feel of the bike.
No minus sign - or letter 'i' - needed for the head badge, either. Get it. |
|
|
|
|
ChinookPass
Posts:809
|
| 09/04/2013 01:02 PM |
|
| jrt, what do you mean "backwards faster look"? Are you talking about compact geometry frames? Or carbon rear triangles? |
|
|
|
|
Funk
Posts:50
|
| 09/04/2013 01:09 PM |
|
I've ridden a Seven since 2002. I did the custom thing and opted for straight titanium, not a mix of Ti and carbon. I put Campy Record on it, some Neutron wheels, and have ~35,000 miles on it. I replaced the wheels last year, the chain when necessary, and rebuilt the right shifter a couple of times. Otherwise, fairly maintenance-free.
As mentioned above, the Ti is pretty easy to care for. If you like new bikes every once in awhile, then it's probably not for you. They last forever. |
|
|
|
|
stronz
Posts:447
|
| 09/04/2013 01:17 PM |
|
| Have a litespeed vortex ca 2005. LOOK fork. This is mostly 6-4 ti but I think parts are 3-2.5. Anyway the ride is stiff but not brutal -- mine has aluminium bars and stem so it could be softened up slightly with carbon bars. For a while I rode it with campy hyperon carbon clinchers which give a wonderful ride compared with aluminum clinchers. Bike weighed in a tad over 15lbs with hyperons. I loved the ride and still do. feels like a scalpel carving its way thru the air -- just very precise and communicative. The BB is not the stiffest and there is definitely some flex there. My new GIANT TCR Advanced SL (2012) by comparison is stiffer in the bottom bracket and more compliant with road imperfections -- definitely more comfortable and about a pound lighter with the same wheels. |
|
|
|
|
thinline
Posts:325
|
| 09/04/2013 02:39 PM |
|
| Not sure what the weight on it is. It's an older Axiom, apparently now the Axiom SL with a former model of a different ame now known as the Axiom. It has a beastly Frankenstein adjustable stem assembly on it that I am sure is ading some noticeable weight, just not sure how much. Bars and seat post are aluminum Richey, crank is a Richey, the rest is older Dura Ace. Wheels are Dura Ace hubs and Mavic rims with traditional spoke set up.
It's funny, the tires ar 23s and I switched to 25s about 2 years ago. I imagine the ride is even smoother with 25s on there. It does ride very nicely and is pretty stiff. Probably not wuite as stiff as my current ride (Paketa Scud) but nothing that makes you go, huh, while climbing. I would need a slightly bigger frame than what I am riding for the demo so my guess is a little added weight and maybe a bit more flex.
And, if I go for it, yup, naked Ti it will be. |
|
|
|
|
jrt1045
Posts:363
|
| 09/04/2013 03:06 PM |
|
Chinook, I was referring to the custom bikes with geometry that a builder should say "no" to. Serotta had a bad habit of this - you end up with flagpoles for a headtube and so on. Probably a result of "C" students at their fit skool |
|
|
|
|
pabiker
Posts:80
|
| 09/04/2013 03:35 PM |
|
Ti MTB which I love. 6/4 Ti Moots YBB years of abuse and it's still kicking.
Big Pluses: doesn't rust, great feel, durability.
Big Minuses: flexy, it can still break, not the lightest option.
Wouldn't use Ti for a SS MTB and at 200+ wouldn't use it for a road bike either. |
|
|
|
|
zootracer
Posts:835
|
| 09/04/2013 07:43 PM |
|
| Surprised no one mentioned Lynskey. |
|
|
|
|
longslowdistance
Posts:2886
|
| 09/04/2013 08:06 PM |
|
I love that ti ride. Current collection includes one of each ti, al, CF, steel. I love the steel bike, but the ti gets ridden the most.
The only two bikes I wish I still had: 70s Colnago Super w/Merckx team paint job and a Lynsky Litespeed Catalyst from the 90's. I'll bet the Litespeed is still going strong.
|
|
|
|
|
Hoshie
Posts:134
|
| 09/04/2013 11:41 PM |
|
It seems popular to assume carbon will wear out prematurely especially when talking about a TI bike's benefits. My "superlight" Scott Addict just turned 6 yrs old and hasn't changed. Still a great ride. Recently added new wheels and a replaced a few aged components and it's as good as ever. So, my experience doesn't tip that to Ti alone.
That being said, I think a nice quality TI frame is a nice bike period. You'll enjoy it if the geometry and design fits your wants / needs.
j |
|
|
|
|
79pmooney
Posts:3189
|
| 09/05/2013 01:43 AM |
|
Hoshie, the bit about ti outlasting CF isn't about road miles, it's about all that other stuff like when the movers handle it not so gently, you knock it over, you blow a trackstand, etc. My steel Mooney has seen all of that plus 45,000 miles over 33 years. A strong well built ti bike would do the same, though my two will probably live much softer lives than the Mooney has.
(An aside - I get a a slightly morbid kick out of riders leaning their CF bikes together a rest stops on organized rides, like I will see a lot of next week. Ti owners almost never do that. Always strikes me as an accident waiting to happen, and I've seen a few.)
Ben |
|
|
|
|
| You are not authorized to post a reply. |
|
Active Forums 4.1
|
|
Latest Forum Posts
Zwift posted in Road Cycling
No articles match criteria.
|