The flip side of this. Riding like this happens. Smart riders sometimes gamble on it happening. Sometimes that gamble pays off.
Edit: there was an infamous stage a few years back where a rider who'd tanked the day before gambled that he could gain enough time in the first two hills and that the three podium sitting teams would infight and not successfully use the 20 miles of flat to chase him down. I was watching that stage and said to my table mate that the DS's of the podium sitters needed to each radio their leader and instruct the team to work the other two in a massive TTT. I said this while those opening climbs were happening.
But no. On the flat, one or two strong worker for one team would power for long pulls, take two minutes out of the lead, pull off and everyone would sit up and take a breath. Meanwhile the solo leader was just riding to his power meter (or maybe it was heart rate), keep the needle on high and take back the lost time over and over again. Went into the final big climb with the margin he needed. Won him a Tour. (Well, until a positive for testosterone came back.)
I'm not a fan of doping at all. But on that stage, the three podium sitting teams didn't deserve the placed they achieved in Paris. Floyd Landis correctly gambled that they would not get their **** together.
|